Confronting a Conspiracy

Here is the nearly complete litigation I have presented to the current members of the nations Superior Court against a questionable bureaucratic system.

5-17-2025 Revision 6-8-2025 Final Revision 6-29-25

To Whom It May Concern:

And in particular, a one XXXXXXXXXXX and any relevant members of the Superior Court of The United States of America. And to state that, it is not my intention to belittle or remind the court of the reasons for its institutional creation, unless of course I am required to do so.

Greetings to you, as this petition comes from me, my birth name is Mark Vincent C, and my business name is Mark Vincent Chambers, I have been and lived at 679 Glenwood DR in Aiken, SC 29803 since 2003 full time, and my birth name and address are the only portions of this document subject to redaction.

I am currently using my birth name, although, so far, only for 1/2 my life, the other half I dangerously used my business name. I have all the relevant engineering degrees, permissions (The Bar), (and want the court to know that am not someone's political or military proxy fighting solution, to their own troubling problem,) so as to petition the court in this manner. I have reached full American Social Security retirement age, and have documentation to prove I am my own legal guardian.

This litigation is being brought by myself, mostly on behalf of myself, and family member(s)?, and any other concurrent or parallel cases must either stand on their own current merit, or wait for the resolution of my case to come to a conclusion, before addressing their possible issues as they might relate to myself, both business and/or individual, this is irrevocable even to the upper court.

The story of this petition is first and foremost a case of intent, or intentions, and secondly a case of faith, both bad and good.

For whatever reasons, and directed by any particular person(s), this petition is to be used to prove a case of intent, bad intention -vs- good intention. On an individual basis, not a collective basis, (for cases with collective basis have much greater chances of NEVER being resolved in a timely fashion, peacefully.) And forever resolve the legal good faith negotiations -vs- bad faith negotiations, or bad intentions, of my situation, in regards to this litigation.

The case is directed towards anyone on the planet (legally employed or otherwise) who is acting in, or advising on behalf of, or has an interest or concern in, preventing its successful outcome. For the actual law rewards good faith, truth, and credibility. While French colonial rules based order trusts,(or any random trust for that matter), can easily reward and disguise bad intention as the law, at any cost, when in fact it is a pseudo law that takes first, and then secondly delivers selective codified results, designed to control said individuals under said trusts, to the easily bent, rules based order.

The technical and moral aspects of this case are closely related, and based on bad faith mentality. So too attempt to create (at this late hour) an illegal trust during my mothers settlement, (a one Linda D. Warner last residing at XXXXXXXXXXXX Dr., Hilton Head Island, SC 29928), borders on organized malice from multiple sources. In this first case, a (The SINGLED OUT SUBJECT originating at the probate court at Beaufort Country, SC. With the assistance of at least an Elizabeth B Mayo of the Novit & Scarminach, P.A. law firm, located at THE JADE BUILDING, SUITE 400, 52 NEW ORLEANS ROAD POST OFFICE DRAWER 14, HILTON HEAD ISLAND, SC 29938), is the legal mechanism for this action. This would then seem to lead to a conspiracy to defraud individuals, among them myself, and now even perhaps my mother, of whom I am a legal heir and beneficiary. This sub-story begins with an insurance policy taken out at my birth.

I was not aware of this policy at the time, but informed by my mothers mother, that, at the age of 21, I was to receive $1000 from a life insurance policy and my grandmother wanted to know if I had actually received the money, I told her I had not, and she then informed me it was my mother who was responsible for arranging this payment. Upon questioning my mother I was told she needed the money for her divorce, and shortly afterword, the full payment was received. At the time I felt bad about this, having admitted she had no money, the payment must have come from the newly married husband, as my mother had to work as a clerk at a cloths store in between marriages to make ends meet during this time.

Moving forwards, and in hind site, this was the time to create, establish, or set up a trust fund baby account, if one was to be set up. But one was not, as the student loan debt option became the financial mechanism of choice during the college years, this occurred in 1980. By 1993 a trust agreement was attempted, but it failed 3 years later as the alleged "trustees, or controllers of trustees" instead privatized the profits, and then socialized the losses in the form of a Social Security Disability, with a representative payee, being established [which as of today, the representative payee aspect, has been revoked (S.S. Case BNC#; 21MG130D56467 & SG-SSA-11, SSA Office 596, 5/27/2025) and I want to remind the readers at this point, that this hearing was held in the state of Georgia, where there are limited appeals, you can't just appeal one issue like this, you have to review a broad set of issues like the case that I'm presenting to YOU right now]. AS I found it difficult to find, not only capable representation at that point in TIME, but also found it difficult to break the bureaucratic hyper political structure in place. [And NOW the addition of the hyper financialization of my name and character, which has been extremely active for all these years. THEY, have almost gone postal, the appearance of preventing people from making money, which is a violation of the constitution of this country as best I'm aware.]

During this time, and repeated often, these trustees and their handlers had a longstanding policy of intentional deception and attempts to weaken the beneficiary by most any means possible (including defamation of character, destroying court electronic and paper evidence), that remains largely in place to this day, especially financially, and this record speaks for its self over time. The examples are numerous and can be listed upon request. What can not be denied, are my talents and accomplishments, they can be found and viewed on my web site, for which a QR code has been included at the end of this document.

Attempts at judgement, reasonable settlement, or resolution on so many issues, were fruitless for over 30 years, any individual, or any collective entity, having an interest with this case, has had ample time to discuss settlement and to date has either refused, torpedoed, neglected to, or been unfortunately unable to settle directly with the beneficiary, for whatever reasons (including nefarious Social Security activities, although they were the first to settle).

This brings us to the meat of this case, two years after the passing of my mother, and with no resolutions having been reached by any interested or involved party(s), there is no alternative except to attempt to prove bad intent on behalf of a number of individuals, courts, institutions, insurance company's, banks (and in particular the WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A. N9777-113SVC, PO BOX 5120, SIOUX FALLS, SD 57117-5120 AND ASSOCIATE ELISABETH MANMOHAN 860/621-0151, elisabeth.manmohan@wellsfargo.com, Bank of Plantsville, 781 Main ST., Plantsville, CT, 06479, OR ANY PARENT BANK OR REPRESENTATIVE ASSOCIATED WITH THIS BANK OR BRANCH), and supposed LAWS. Some of which have yet to be informed of the possible legal action about to be taken upon them.

My most recent good faith discussions came right after the passing of my mother. Her current husband, (a supposed trustee), and I discussed separating the (closed and partially paid) life insurance policy from the trust, the trustee, or the trustees handlers, wanted to include it in a forever trust. I knew it was a bad idea, and I was hoping he would recall about the last paid in full, life insurance payment situation. But the ward did not, the same said trustee did then offer a million dollars in gold to leave the country, an offer of which I refused. At that time I would have settled for the meager 25% insurance policy payment and a link to a court file or the million dollar trust fund, but once again, trustee or handler(s) bad faith, outweighed the beneficiary good faith effort, and the trustee and or handler(s) prevented this deal from reaching a conclusion.

Leaving all my (held by trustees, institutions, handlers, holders and/or the likes of) named or otherwise assets aside, and now to the issue of my mothers money.

We know she had none at the beginning of the marriage because she herself stated so. And we know she never had a job once married the second time, so any acquired monies would have to have been derived, from the role as the husbands wife, or, as was exposed during her estate consultation, she somehow acquired a substantial trust fund. That was tracked down as most likely having originating from her grandfather on her mother side, a Mr. George Fox from East Windsor, CT. This came into being in 1997, conveniently the same year as my disability status was begun.

During this time, one dinner evening, my mother registered a complaint with me about being the victim of a fraud, which was odd considering I was her fiduciary victim with the intent to follow my situation to its logical conclusion (disability status-vs-business opportunity). But not until learning of her revocable trust situation, did I consider adding my mothers situation into mine, in an all assets inclusive collective conspiracy to defraud, which is basically where we stand today.

And here is why, by folding what was left of the million dollar insurance policy into some questionable trust agreement, the handlers now subject the questionable trust and all its contents, to the precedence of the life insurance policy as punitive damages to the continuing individual bad faith negotiations of all the years past. This is what has occurred in my humble honest opinion in the form of the non flexible (inflationary) rules based order(s).

This then theoretically can, or should be, be rolled into one big conspiracy to defraud not only me of my named and otherwise assets, but now it would appear, my mother, (or one of her legal heirs or beneficiaries, of which I am one), of her grandfathers wishes in the form of her revocable trust. And I want here to remind the court of the hardships imposed upon the family's of these people affected by these decisions over generations, it creates a separation of the family unit that appears to be irreparable in so many ways while enriching the bureaucratic class in the process.

Having said that, and since most everyone involved with these matters has had ample opportunity and time to settle their individual interest(s), in either, my financial affairs, (named or otherwise) or now (two years to the day) in the attempted closing of my mothers estate, a new direction must be taken.

A pleading, or an ultimatum, has to be made, to any and all {[trustees, conservators, handlers, courts, banks, any involved party(s) insurance company's, institutions, creditors, even including militarily controlled/interested assets], to recognize that possession is only 80% of the law as 10% belongs to the beneficiary and 10% belongs to the originator, and who is now in a better position to declare, and be correct about, the actual originator(s)}, in the form of willingly, peacefully, unconditionally and promptly, surrendering these assets of concern, {named and/or otherwise, to their intended beneficiary (business or individual), as directed by the originator, or their current representatives, (as long as those same said representatives are not a subject of the litigation). Or subject those same said mostly named assets, to the risk of confiscation by either the power of myself (with Superior Court written approval), or by the creator(s), (or originator(s), of the same said named assets, by any and all means necessary, including physical confiscation, the latter of which will not be done, arranged, or timed by myself.

I am open to setting up a personal meeting to resolve this matter as the tenticles of it reach so far and wide as a complete resolution may be nearly impossible, And I want to thank all the unamed people, Judges, and law firms that helped me get to this place and point in time, most of you know who you are. And in particular the last one, the nationwide top 10 awarded, Knapp law firm PC, for their and Linda's efforts during this process.

This document finally does indeed end my litigation efforts toWARD the troubled collective French colonial trust, that to date is not worth the individual paper it was written on, in regards to my case. This legal action is taken on by myself, or any approved associate, who is/are not a subject or concern of the litigation.

Destroying, deleting, misdirecting, or ignoring this litigation, is subject to the full extent of international laws and public opinions.

Mark Vincent C

________________________